
I found this post by Fred Wilson about atoms and bits to be a nice counterpoint to this post from a few years back by Chris Dixon. There are so many advantages that a software product has over a business that delivers physical goods, whether that is inventory, startup costs, or distribution. (Yes, if you build a mobile app, you have to pay the vig to Apple/Google, but you also can distribute at zero incremental cost to hundreds of millions of people.) From Fred’s post:
we should … understand that the timelines [for working on businesses that focus on atoms] will be longer and the road to adoption will be more challenging.
The fact is that atoms are just harder to work with than bits. However, that very difficulty can provide a moat around your business (“where there’s muck there’s brass”). If your business is bits, find another moat (branding, network effects, niche domination).
I am excited to go to
Slack is an amazing productivity tool when
I was troubleshooting a data issue in a production environment. It wasn’t heroku, rather a rails environment hosted on AWS. It was Rails 4.2, ruby 2.2.3.
I ran into someone at a meetup recently who’d built a SaaS that had a pretty decent MRR. Enough to support one person. Which is a huge achievement!
For the past couple of months I’ve been doing a short segment at the beginning of the
So I was doing a load test and saw behavior that reminded me that sometimes you just need to test.
The cloud is amazing for load testing your system. If you design your system to be behind a load balancer (which, in many applications, means pushing state to a database and having stateless compute nodes), you can easily switch out those nodes in different scenarios.