Comments on: Is transparent access control worth unintelligible error messages? http://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/archives/122 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:11:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kris Thompson http://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/archives/122/comment-page-1#comment-429 Kris Thompson Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:49:50 +0000 http://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/?p=122#comment-429 Forgot to mention this, maybe as a quick option one could use this sourceforge project as a better integrated solution, http://securityfilter.sourceforge.net/. I have never used it myself but it was recommend to me to consider. Forgot to mention this, maybe as a quick option one could use this sourceforge project as a better integrated solution, http://securityfilter.sourceforge.net/.

I have never used it myself but it was recommend to me to consider.

]]> By: Kris Thompson http://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/archives/122/comment-page-1#comment-428 Kris Thompson Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:44:10 +0000 http://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/?p=122#comment-428 I almost agree with you Dan. Just recently I have been diving into extreme detail into Security using WebWork2 and found that CMS is great for simple sites because it is a quick and simple way to slap on CMS...really quick... and it can just as quickly have role based authorization as you mentioned. But due largely to the issue of generic login screen it just doesn't seem to integrate that well into the site. Now for a small companies intranet it doesn't matter. After learning more about webworks's ability to collect a group of actions into a namespace and tie that into Filters as your security I would say (if using Webwork) that is my preferred method. As a newbie to AOP I would like to investigate it more as an option but comparitivly speaking on the amount of time it would take to set up, CMS still blows it away. I'm not going to discount CMS as an option because cost effectively speaking it is nice. I almost agree with you Dan. Just recently I have been diving into extreme detail into Security using WebWork2 and found that CMS is great for simple sites because it is a quick and simple way to slap on CMS…really quick… and it can just as quickly have role based authorization as you mentioned. But due largely to the issue of generic login screen it just doesn’t seem to integrate that well into the site. Now for a small companies intranet it doesn’t matter. After learning more about webworks’s ability to collect a group of actions into a namespace and tie that into Filters as your security I would say (if using Webwork) that is my preferred method. As a newbie to AOP I would like to investigate it more as an option but comparitivly speaking on the amount of time it would take to set up, CMS still blows it away. I’m not going to discount CMS as an option because cost effectively speaking it is nice.

]]>